27-inch iMac 5K Retina Display Review: It’s Not Worth it
The 27-inch iMac with 5K Retina Display was introduced in October of 2014. It’s main selling point is its incredible high resolution display at a pixel density of 218 PPI, a total of 14.7 million pixels and a resolution of 5120 x 2880. That’s twice the resolution of the regular 27-inch iMac.
The specs of this iMac 5K feature a Core i5 processor at 3.5GHz, 8GB of RAM, 1TB Fusion drive and an AMD Radeon R9 M290X with 2GB of video memory and I have to wonder if that’s a slight bottleneck for a display of this resolution.
For house keeping purposes, let’s run through the I/O and other standard features. The iMac 5K has a front facing FaceTime camera, 4 USB 3.0 ports, 2 ThunderBolt 2.0 ports, an Ethernet port, SD card slot and an audio port for headphones or speakers. It’s quite a thin machine as you can see, with the entire computer neatly tucked away in the back of the display. A wireless bluetooth mouse and keyboard come as standard. OS X Yosemite comes preinstalled.
The main selling point is the display of course, but is all this worth the €2,699 price tag? Well for starters for the first time ever, you can truly have an extraordinarily large desktop area. At maximum settings, there’s a massive amount of screen real estate here, which is perfect for having a wide array of applications running. Trouble is, this can’t be good for your eyes, everything is simply way too small. This isn’t practical at all. You really need to drop the settings down to something more manageable. You’d need a microscope to see everything.
You see the iMac 5K’s resolution can be adjusted by the user in the system preferences menu under displays. You’ll see 5 scaled resolutions, one for larger text, which is 1600 x 900, then 2048 x 1152, Best, which is retina at 2560 x 1440, then 2880 x 1620 and more space, which is the aforementioned max res of 3200 x 1800. So where is the avertised 5120 x 2800 resolution? Well the 2560 x 1440 is basically pixel doubled, so it has four times the detail of a traditional display.
The typography is amazing, icons, HD and 4K videos and high quality images look great. Really super sharp when viewed at best settings. Basically if you own a Retina MacBook Pro, then you know actually what to expect from this machine’s display. Web pages look great because the text is crystal clear and beautifully rendered.
But how’s the performance of the entry level iMac 5K? Well using Disk Speed Test it achieved a write speed of 300.6Mb/S and a read speed of 551.4Mb/S. That compares to my own 27-inch iMac from 2012 with a write speed of 311 Mb/S and a read speed of 425Mb/S. The 2012 iMac also managed a NovaBench score of 1527. While this 27-inch iMac 5K achieved a score of just 659 but we have to appreciate that my 2012 iMac does have double the RAM and a much more powerful Core i7 processor. It was also, and still is, cheaper than the 27-inch Retina iMac. Just something to think about.
This iMac 5K will meet most users needs, be it light to moderate productivity apps, which come included in Yosemite, Pages, numbers and Keynote are all free now, however, more extreme usage may not be so great. There has been numerous reports that the 5K display is a bit if a resource hog and can slow down video editing export and render times in Final Cut Pro X by 14%. Moreover, the AMD Radeon R9 M290X GPU runs a little too hot for my liking. Gaming performance is acceptable although you have to be aware that not all games will run at such high resolutions and you may need to drop the resolution down before you fire up certain games.
Although I didn’t encounter any truly egregious performance issues, the fact that this uses a 5K display means that there has to be a certain amount of GPU horsepower lost in the process. In other words, an iMac with the exact same specs but without a Retina display would likely perform that little bit better than one with a 5K display. Consequently, beyond the novelty of owning such a machine, I can’t really recommend it, when you could buy a 27-inch iMac with more RAM, a better GPU, faster processor and more hard drive space than this one.
There are very few applications on the market that are designed to take advantage of such a high res display, at least right now. So this machine is a bit ahead of its time. For €20 less, you could buy a high end non-retina 27-inch iMac with a Core i7 3.5GHz processor, 16GB of RAM, a 3TB SATA drive and an Nvidia Geforce GTX 775M graphics processor that has 2GB of video memory. So what if it doesn’t have the pixel density, it’s not like you’ll notice it all the time. After about 20 minutes the retina display effect kind of wears of anyway. Are you going to be anymore productive because you’ve got a 5K iMac? With slightly compromised performance it could be argued you’ll be less productive.
There’s no doubt that 5K displays will be the future, and I won’t deny that when you consider Dell’s standalone 5K display is roughly the same price as this iMac 5K, this suddenly becomes a bargain. I mean you get a gorgeous 5K display and a Mac computer all-in-one for €2,699. That’s fantastic, at least on paper. However, in the interests of bang for the buck and performance, if you want a 27-inch iMac that will deliver a smooth, efficient and fully optimised user experience with no compromises, then buy a non-retina iMac.
Please feel free to leave your comments on this iMac 5K below. Be sure to subscribe to Computing Forever on YouTube for more video content.
2 thoughts on “27-inch iMac 5K Retina Display Review: It’s Not Worth it”
but i got it already. its great
Maybe you should have bought more “power” into the iMac.
Upgrade to 16GB Ram, 4GHz i7 Chip and maybe the Radeon M295x ???
Just my 2 cents.